> The means never justifies the ends. No matter if
> Tulsi Gabbard manages to stops World War III and
> saves millions of lives tomorrow, a devotee of
> Krishna would never put another people’s life in
> danger for some imagined benefit in the future.
I have only presented a geopolitical context. If Tulsi Gabbard has had major compromises so far, supporting abortions etc. then it is very likely that she will continue to compromise. Would that be peace? Rather shallow, short-lived. There would be no change in consciousness.
> I personally am against abortion and I understand
> about half of the population think that it’s a
> woman’s right to have abortion. But the fact
> remains abortion is rejected within Vedic
> philosophy. Vaishnavas avoid harming other living
> beings, end of story. You may well disagree with
> me that is your right but I hope you can still see
> the hypocrisy of a person who wrote lyrics
> fervently against abortion, who gave lectures for
> decades saying that abortion advocates are
> “killing the kids”. Then he turns around and
> expects us to support his disciple Tulsi Gabbard
> campaigning for abortion.
Personally, I have always considered abortion as an evil done to another entity and breaking laws of the nature, especially because of irresponsibility in begetting and bearing consequences, so from this point of view I look at the matter. I thought so without even having met SIF Poland and having not read the Bhagavad Gita that time.
Yes, it is hypocrisy.
> Tulsi Gabbard has a 100% voting record with both
> Planned Parenthood and NARAL.
> PBS News - Jan 22 2019
> She told the left-leaning website Ts that she
> supports using federal dollars to fund
Is there any evidence of the political activities of the Independents For Godly Government after February 1977?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/01/2019 05:03AM by DaWatcher.