You do not have proprietary rights on exposing this or any other cult. Please play nice here.
Don't make a hypcrite of yourself now.
Just like Chris Butler you are making assertions that information is not true and yet you are not providing any example of this. Specify what is not true or keep your opinions to yourself. I know about the campaign here of anonymous cowards who are doing SoI favours by attacking their opposition. We are dealing with facts, something you and your friends here are noticeably short on to be able to poo-poo anyone outside your little clique that does not agree with sympathetic memorialising of the cult. If you want to correct something then spell it out, you can do it here, on the cultofbutler forum, on the blog, via email, on your own website. You have options to prove you are not simply being malicious or a liar on this point. To this day even from their lawyers there has been no refutation of a single fact on that website and that is including over 100 pages of lawyers letters and lengthy corresspondence with senior disciples in this day and age. Not a single fact
- so if you have one then bring it. I note that you have no issue supporting this site despite the abundance of foolishness, riddles and mistruths which have been posted here. Wouldn't be a personal issue because you don't like the culprits in SoI being named would it?
Do not tell me what my motives are or what websites I own and you would be wrong on both counts. I'm not going to argue with you or your cheerleaders on this.
I am not interested in you or anyone else telling me what my rights are here or anywhere else. The success and the effort that has been put in to doing what the old timers WOULD not do - and that is to warn others about this cult is self-evident. Likewise I am not getting into a slinging match here about it.
You are posting historical documents and at the same time trying to say that the cult changed that it wasn't always like that, you are leaving out details that you or any other disciple would be aware of and that is your choice but it leaves a lot of gaps even with documents. You are always falling back onto the old stand by of you can't possibly know because you're not me, but me is someone that got letters like this and still hung around - so that hardly makes you a credible advocate for what is a cult and who should get out or not does it? What makes you so special that noone can correct you or ask you a question but you can make assertions about what everyone else thinks and what they are up to? Just another anonymous hypocrite - with a monopoly on suffering in the cult also. Anyone can indeed see for themselves that anyone who got even one letter like this and stuck around is a brainwashed imbecile who deserves whatever they got and that trait does not qualify you to attack anyone else or their website. It is both easy and cowardly to attack those who have made themselves known while hiding yourself.
I posted in response to you because I am sick of the games that go on here and the favours done to the cult by the constant bs and the campaign of hostility started here defending SoI against their best critics. I will protect the actual fight against SoI because I support it. Yes that is my choice and you don't have to agree with it, but don't start by telling lies about something you are not involved with, choose not to be involved with and have no right or basis to criticise.