Quote
just-googling
..no autopsies
Good point. The tradition is also for cremation so there would be no remains to exhume later - arsenic poisoning as cause of death can actually be proven by modern science many years after the fact. In India I imagine that the funeral rites would be carried out quickly also on account of the hot climate.
To complicate matters a little further in the West in the modern world hospitals have policies for dealing with the death of someone in a religously sensitive way. There are many religions which are very sensitive about autopsies being carried out in accordance with their beliefs and as such the hospitals are reluctant to proceed unless it is absolutely neccessary, such as if there is suspicious circumstances.
Regarding ACB an old man who was not in the best of health (he had at least one non disputed heart attack, some accounts claim as many as three) dying is hardly suspicious and arsenic poisoning is notoriously difficult to detect in it's symptoms. I am sure the authorities would not want to desecrate the remains of such a revered person by a speculative autopsy even if there was reasons to believe at the time that he was murdered.
Quote
Thus, this Eastern type religion starts to look like more and more like a CULT... people worshiping one man as God... people painting their faces like Zulus on the warpath... people dancing fanatically and faking ecstacy!
In trying to understand Siddha's cult fully there is certainly a lot of history to be taken into account. The practices of ISKCON are the blue print for brain washing. To look at any summary of the practice : isolation, applying ritual to every aspect of life ie - sleep, eating, dress, following a strict schedule, keeping busy so there is not time to think, meditation, chanting...
ACB taught that there was no other process required for going to Krishna than Bhakti Yoga, (devotional service) and particularly the sankirtan (chanting) movement as propogated by Lord Caitanya, however he insisted on rituals and applying traditions of India in the West. Head shaving, dhotis, dandas (a stick, to negotiate treacherous footing or maybe if it was neccessary to kill a snake is a practical consideration trekking about India, but hardly required in 60s San Francisco), getting up at 4am to chant japa, the position and treatment of women and children etc. with the inference that all these rituals made one more spiritual.
KC has always claimed to be distinct from Hinduism, so the question is where are these 'traditions' derived from? They are not solely from scripture because there is so much that is in Srimad Bhagavatam that points towards it being acceptable to worship the 'demigods' as they do in Hinduism. Until Caitanya came along 500 years ago - which actually makes KC a new religion and not the ancient traditions that it claims - there was little emphasis on Krishna as the supreme.
Krishna worship is apparently the dominant following in India, followed closely by Shivites, (worshipping Shiva) who in KC is seen in a somewhat negative light since he is set to bring about the end of existence. Even in the West ISKCON has taken to placing deities and images of Hanumann and Ganesha as a concession to many of their followers being Indians of a Hindu background, eventhough this is against the practices set down by their founder :?
Caitaya is not the figure in India that those who preach KC would have us believe and has always been a somewhat obscure and maligned system of belief which has had most of it's following in the West, mainly on account of ACB.