When a Guru Becomes Successful - Insights From Social Psychology
(Quoted from above)
Quote
"He began to believe, that he was a savior and a hero,
that he really was this “god” figure.”
"He degenerated into a really paranoid, terrifying person.”
How could this happen?
Corboy recommends that readers learn about a couple of social psychology
experiments -- one, termed by Corboy, the Cookie Experiment.
Then, learn about the Stanford Prison Experiment
Here are some links, some quotations, and a bit of commentary by Corboy.
[
psycnet.apa.org]
[
www.google.com]
Washington Post
Quote
Keltner once had groups of three people sit before a bowl that contained five cookies, and each volunteer took one. That left two cookies. By mutual agreement, the volunteers always left the last cookie in the bowl. So who took the fourth cookie?
Invariably, Keltner found, the person in the group who had been randomly assigned to feel powerful rudely grabbed the fourth cookie.
"We videotaped how they ate," Keltner said, laughing. "The high-powered person ate with their mouth open, cookie crumbs falling all over their shirt."
[
www.washingtonpost.com]
Harvard Business Review
[
hbr.org]
Quote
consider the “cookie experiment” reported by the psychologists Dacher Keltner, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, and Cameron Anderson in 2003. In this study, teams of three students each were instructed to produce a short policy paper. Two members of each team were randomly assigned to write the paper. The third member evaluated it and determined how much the other two would be paid, in effect making them subordinates. About 30 minutes into the meeting, the experimenter brought in a plate of five cookies—a welcome break that was in fact the focus of the experiment. No one was expected to reach for the last cookie on the plate, and no one did. Basic manners dictate such restraint. But what of the fourth cookie—the extra one that could be taken without negotiation or an awkward moment? It turns out that a little taste of power has a substantial effect. The “bosses” not only tended to take the fourth cookie but also displayed signs of “disinhibited” eating, chewing with their mouths open and scattering crumbs widely.
It’s a cute little experiment, but it beautifully illustrates a finding consistent across many studies. When people—independent of personality—wield power, their ability to lord it over others causes them to
(1) become more focused on their own needs and wants;
(2) become less focused on others’ needs, wants, and actions; and
(3) act as if written and unwritten rules that others are expected to follow don’t apply to them.
To make matters worse, many bosses suffer a related form of power poisoning: They believe that they are aware of every important development in the organization (even when they are remarkably ignorant of key facts). This affliction is called “the fallacy of centrality”—the assumption that because one holds a central position, one automatically knows everything necessary to exercise effective leadership.
Corboy commentary:
Do note that in the experiment, persons were randomly assigned to
the leadership position. They did not volunteer.
Now, consider the guru situation.
*The person is not randomly assigned to be leader, but has sought
leadership.
*The leader has not only sought leadership but believes he or she
is God, speaks for God and or believes himself to possess a technology
that brings salvation.
* Has been leader for many years
* The leader is aware of and controls every feature of the organization.
(though as the leader ages, subordinates may take control)
* The leader has all the features listed above and selects followers based
on their submissiveness
*** The leader's organization is isolated behind a compound or in a remote
area, placing both leader and submissive followers away from outside
sources of information.
Social isolation has been recognized as a powerful risk factor for abuse
of power.
This was demonstrated in the Stanford Prison Simulation Experiment.
[
www.prisonexp.org]