Christopher Hansard
Date: May 29, 2007 06:48AM
Cirrus your comments below in black, with my thoughts in my favourite color.
However, I am shocked and disgusted at your personal attack on Ms Pulver.May I respectfully suggest you consult a copy of the Shorter Oxford Dictionary to contemplate upon the meaning of 'speculative'. Why do I suggest this? Well because my posting about Miss Pulver was exactly that, reasonable, vigorous and speculative questions. [/color:c337b7ad2c]
For all the good work you have done you discredit yourself when you make ungrounded statements (the statements were factual, the questions were speculative)[/color:c337b7ad2c]
We all hold a great deal of very important information and can testify (Interesting. How can former apprentices and colleagues of Hansards testify against him when they insist they neither witnessed nor were made aware of an reported abuses?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
You have tried to discredit Mr Lawson, Ms Hare and Mr Nelson (reasonable questions that speculated on their association and role in promoting Hansard's activities)[/color:c337b7ad2c]
I know all of these people personally and they are all good, honest, intelligent people (who stated they were not?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
I find your attempts to defame (please cite me specific examples of defamation)[/color:c337b7ad2c] them offensive..
Hundreds, perhaps thousands of people worldwide have been taken in and fooled by Christopher Hansard.(perhaps, but they were not apprentices/colleagues of Hansard who actively promoted and maintained the Dur-Con invention, while clients, were it seems, being abused under their very noses) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
Hodder and Stoughton, International publishers were fooled (not fooled, they presumably saw a profit opportunity?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
Agents and journalists worldwide were fooled by him (agree)[/color:c337b7ad2c]
Hundreds of patients from all walks of life, including medical doctors and consultants, international celebrities and musicians spiritually adepts and phychics and many that travelled from all over the work specifically to see him (Wow! its the Second Coming!) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
There are Tibetan monks (please give me the names, location, and when this happened) [/color:c337b7ad2c]and businessmen who have been fooled by him.
All the students and apprentices, who were all intelligent, educated people that trusted him and his teachings were fooled by him (yet so overwhelmed by his magical boomerang, that they fell into a soma like state, and became unquestionning droids, who were comletely ignorant of ten years of reported abuse?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
You have never met Mr Hansard so you have no direct experience of him but you seek to defame (give me a specific example)[/color:c337b7ad2c] anyone who was taken in and convinced by him.
What you do not seem to consider is that the teachings Mr Hansard was presenting held a lot of the great universal truths and we were responding to the truths within those archetypes (cobblers!). [/color:c337b7ad2c]
I personally had a desire to grow and experience a spiritual path. That is not a crime (no, but the fact that clients were seemingly abused for so many years, without any action being taken by apprentices/colleagues of the [i:c337b7ad2c]Master of Dur Con [/i:c337b7ad2c]could, do you consider, be regarded as so?) . [/color:c337b7ad2c]
I appreciate to misrepresent these teaching as being of a lineage which is not true is unacceptable. I understand why you consider it is possible that Christopher Hansard has misrepresented the Bon religion of Tibet.(thank you) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
However, if you read the actual teachings in his books there is much that is authentic (in relation to what exactly, since it based upon a crass and cynical plagiarism)[/color:c337b7ad2c]
Many people who have used these techniques and attended his workshops would come forward and express positive feedback of their experiences with Christopher Hansard. (and many have stepped foreward on this forum and documented the most appalling abuse, so much for compassion and spiritual development!) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
What is not acceptable is that he has been dishonest and lied about his background and lineage. It is unacceptable that in the process of his work he has abused many women. It is unacceptable that he has misrepresented his medical skills (Having been in rapture about his spiritual integrity and authenticity of his ‘teaching’, we get to the point!). [/color:c337b7ad2c]
Your action against Ms Pulver is malevolent in the extreme, it is defamation (give me a specific example)[/color:c337b7ad2c] which I believe is against the law (it is if it defamation but my posting is raising speculative questions and contains factual statements, that is not defamatory) [/color:c337b7ad2c]. I hope you will have the integrity to remove it from your site. Do you understand integrity and compassion Mr Bowe? (unfortunately not, perhaps I should have followed Mr.Hansard’s teaching?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
How are we to trust you when you constantly seek to antagonise and discredit us? (raise legitimate questions you mean?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]Are we to believe that any attempts we make to speak opening will be picked apart by you to seek a new angle and to create a new entry on your blogsite? (you have nothing to hide, right? Thus nothing to fear!)[/color:c337b7ad2c]
I have no idea of where you are coming from with your whole enquiry as even much of the ‘evidence’ you provide on your site is not actually based on fact (really? would you like to debate with me, on that fact-free assertion?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]
If you read his books you would know simple information such as: his teacher died when CH was 27, (and you still believe that hogwash?) [/color:c337b7ad2c]he makes no claim to come from a bonpo or monastic lineage, basic things seem to escape your knowledge. Your arguments all along are incredibly spurious and not grounded in fact.(so keen to defend the fake guru, even if he did abuse women, what a strange combination of loyalties!) [/color:c337b7ad2c]