With the assistance of his therapist, Christopher Hansard distributed letters reintroducing himself to past clients and announcing his move to his present practice at 6 Lower Grosvenor Place in Victoria. Knowing of Christopher's past abuses, his two primary therapists continued to encourage Christopher Hansard to practice and even to gain credentials. Knowing of his fraud, that being the published versions of the story of his teachings in 3 books, that are directly responsible for 100's of clients in some cases investing thousands of pounds in fraudulent, ineffective procedures and treatments, and many others suffering sexual exploitation, abuse and coercion, his therapists continue to support, and protect Christopher Hansard from the consequences of his own actions. Despite being made aware of continuing abuses through out therapy, they continue to encourage him to practice. Despite knowing that his publications, workshops, and teachings are the symptoms of delusion, and serious illness, and were not based in reality what so ever, they support him. Despite adhering to a code of ethics themselves which they apparently disregard. One of his therapists was a prior client of Christopher Hansard's before taking him on as her own patient. As his patient she believed wholly his story of spiritual training, and as his therapist defended his delusions as they validate her own beliefs. For a brief period, the other therapist enjoyed client referrals from Christopher Hansard. These are both clear examples of collusion, as is their continuing encouragement and protection when faced with the reality that Christopher Hansard is dangerous, is delusional, and their various forms of 'treatment' are not helping.
Meanwhile, Christopher Hansard continues to deny the allegations.Quote
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: xxxx
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008
From: <christopher@xxxx.xxx>
To:
xxxx@xxxx.xxxDear xxxx
I think it is very important to bring
some objectivity and clarity to this situation.
On first hearing about the statement which you have repeated I too through
a specialist lawyer contacted a colleague within the Sapphire Unit and
found that there had not been any such allegations made, and I was informed
that any allegations would be immediately acted upon and then would be
investigated.
I for one am sure those at the Sapphire Unit who continue to receive complaints would be very interested in Christopher's assertions in his defense, as would his victims...These allegations made primarily over the
Internet are untrue and
in twenty years of working as a practitioner I have
never had any improper sexual relationship of any type with my clients....These allegations containing reference to theSapphire Unit are now almost two years old.
...These are allegations only, not actual events, and there is a situation
where the old saying of 'there is no smoke without fire' does not apply,
both smoke and fire have been created. I was stalked and harassed on the
internet and in my daily life with all of these allegations.
I have checked more than once with the Sapphire Unit, as I am allowed to do, and I
have been told that there are no allegations recorded against me. As to
Witness against Abuse, anyone in the general public can go and say anything
they like to Witness against Abuse.
There has never been any action against me sponsored or advised by Witness
against Abuse.
I am completely innocent of these allegations ...
...
Christopher
It was in March of 2007 that it was discovered that Christopher Hansard had taken advantage of another patient despite his many dramatic demonstrations of remorse and sadness that he claimed were caused by the continuing online allegations. His supposed suffering did not seem however to put a dent in his appetite for his patients. Mind the statement and denial of Christopher Hansard above, as you read through the correspondences that follow
Quote
On 25/7/07, "K.A." <K.A.@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Daer Christopher
>
> I received a letter in the post this morning telling me about your move to
> Victoria. How funny! My brother P.A. has been wanting to get in
> touch with you, he now lives in Latvia but he comes to London regularly. He
> has in the meantime had xxxx and did not respond to any kind
> of medication. He was very ill ... Anyway next time he
> comes to London, most probably in September he will call you as he has also
> very fond memories of you from the time you were still in Barons Court.
>
> I myself have now been diagnosed with xxxx, it is not as bad
> as P.A. but I have to take medication called Azacot, it is a kind of
> antiinflammatory and acts like an aspirin.
>
> I was thinking of maybe coming to see you. I have stopped eating wheat and
> already feel much better. I am off for 3 weeks and back at end of August and
> will call you to make an appointment. Have you come across people with this
> disease.
>
> I am not sure you will remember who I am but I used to come to your flat
> before you had clinic off High street Kensington and there is a whole group
> of us that used to come and be treated by you.
> I hope to hear from you.
>
> love,
> K.A.
>
From: cheristopher hansard <ch@xxxx.xxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007
To: K.A. <K.A.@xxxx.xxx>
Conversation: an old patient of yours-K.A.
Subject: Re: an old patient of yours-K.A.
Thursday 26 July 2007
Dear K.A.
Thank you for your email, informing me of your brother's condition and that
of your own. I would be happy to do what I can to assist you both in your
healing. Yes, I have had experience of this condition. I have assisted
people with xxxx, each person though needs a different
approach as they as individuals, have different needs healthwise. If you
wish to make an appointment please do so when it is most convenient. The
initial consultation will take one hour and will cost £145.00, any
subsequent treatments will be £60.00 per hour and extra costs may be
incurred if I need to prescribe and make you herbal medicines. Thank you for
your reply and I look forward to been of assistance to you and your brother.
Faithfully
Christopher Hansard
"love, K.A." While practitioners do not normally encourage such affections from patients, Christopher Hansard seems to be an exception to the rules in every way. Bear in mind Christopher Hansard was 'happily' married while he lived and practiced out of his residence in Baron's Court.
It would however not be long after K.A. began treatment that Christopher Hansard would again cross over the line in his treatment room to meet what was evidently an admiring, impressionable patient, who read all of his books, and poured over every word he said hardly disguising her school-girl crush. Christopher Hansard sent his patient K.A. an inviting iCard.
It is for this reason that some of his victims, having had their admirations confused, distorted and manipulated, are so afraid, and too ashamed to come forward even now. What they need to understand is that what happened to them, was not their fault. They did not invite it even if they found themselves having feelings of admiration. It was and is, Christopher Hansard's responsibility to uphold a duty of care, and not to take advantage of a patients vulnerable feelings and natural transference that may occur. When a practitioner crosses that line, it is counter-transference, and it is wrong, and for Christopher Hansard it is a pattern.
Quote
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: RE: christopher has sent you an Apple iCard
From: "K.A." <K.A.@xxxx.xxx>
Date: Fri, February 15, 2008
To: "christopher" <christopher@xxxx.xxx>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The card is so cute, you look very curious, I look shy and
feel protected
by you.Lots love and Huge big kiss on your lips, K.A.
________________________________
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008
> From:
christopher@xxxx.xxx> To:
K.A.@xxx.xxx> Subject: christopher has sent you an Apple iCard
>
> This iCard has been sent to you from christopher
After less than a year of treatment, Christopher Hansard was initiating a sexual relationship with K.A. or perhaps merely continuing one from long ago in Baron's Court. What ever the case, K.A. was not the only recipient of a such an amorous iCard from Christopher Hansard that day. The invitation he sent to his patient K.A. was followed by an apology only after it had been discovered by a former colleagueQuote
>From: "christopher hansard" <christopher@xxxx.xxx>
>To: "K.A." <K.A.@xxxx.xxx>
>Date: February 17, 2008
>Subject: Apology
>
>Dear K.A.
>
>I am writing to you to apologise for sending you the valentines card and its
>contents as this was and is highly inappropriate and wrong. As a patient it
>is unethical and morally wrong to do what I have done, and for that I am
>very sorry for creating any false illusions and for instigating any possible
>behaviours that may have lead you to believe that things could go further.
>
>I am very sorry and offer a complete and unreserved apology for my
>inappropriate behaviour.
>
>Sincerely
>Christopher Hansard
One of Christopher's former fiancees was Cc'd in on this apology, but his continuing sexual relation with K.A. immediately following this would only further prove the insincerity of his apology and that it was merely for demonstrationQuote
----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008
> From:
christopher@xxxx.xxx> To:
K.A.@xxxx.xxx> Subject: Re: christopher sent you a Care2 eCard!
>
> Did you read the poem my love i love u
>
> K.A. wrote:
>> That is a sweet card, it says I love you on a pink heart.
>>
>> Kisses
>> K.A.
>> ________________________________
Despite this seeming 'budding relationship' with his patient, he attempted to seduce another patient in May who was vulnerable with concussion. Once she was feeling stronger she attempted to confront Christopher, the result was he told his patient that she was the one in the wrong, and that it was all part of her own transference. Something his therapist had taught him.Quote
From: "R.R." <R.R.@xxxx.xxx>
To: "H.O." <H.O.@xxxx.xxx>
Date: June 16, 2008
Subject:
I went to see christopher- upshot was he told me it was transference. I said i didnt know where the line was btwn us and he snapped at me and said he was very clear. i asked him about the websites and he denied all of it and said these women were damaged.he told me about relationships with 2 people at the clinic.
..he asked me 3 times if i was posting things about him and in a veiled way threatened me if so.
..he asked me 3 times if he had crossed the line with me and i said yes and he said it was transference. and that was it.
..i was v nervous, i cried 3 times, but i also stayed pretty calm and he was very angry at the start so i tried to diffuse things. I didnt go there to start a scene,i had wanted the truth.
..amongst him asking me about sex and telling me if I ever wanted to "have my wicked way" with him allI had to do was give him vodka..
And when a former colleague contacted him with their concerns regarding a more recent complaint, just mere months after he initiated the sexual relationship with his patient K.A., this was his response;Quote
>From: "christopher hansard" <christopher@xxxx.xxx>
>To: "H.O" <H.O@xxxx.xxx>
>Date: June 23, 2008
>Subject: xxxx
>
>Hello xxx
>
>I am sorry that you are been harrangued by a past client of mine. However, they can do nothing to you in anyway, at all. I would appreciate that you let me know who this is, so if anything takes place, I prepare things. ...
>
>all the best
>christopher
When another former colleague had also been informed of the breach of boundaries in May attempted to contact Christopher Hansard's therapist the response was that his patient was not breaking any laws. This particular therapist continues to endorse Christopher Hansard despite pleas from those who have either been abused themselves, or those who can offer credible testimony proving that Christopher Hansard is delusional and continues to break ethical and moral boundaries. It is perhaps time to make it a law.
Quote
>From: "M.F." <M.F.@xxxx.xxx>
>To: "H.O" <H.O.@xxxx.xxx>
>Date: June 17, 2008
>Subject: Christopher
>
>I thinks its best to move on and let go it what I suggest by going to
>the police all they will say is file a report.
>Christopher is not breaking the law, its only when many people start
>to complain, then the police will take it seriously. He is not break
>the law.
>There is no organization that can actually expel him or even reprimand
>him or strike him off. As my cousin says the world is round.
>
>Its time to let go and let god!
>
>
>Regards
>
>M.F.
Perhaps more so ridiculous if not completely irresponsible was the reply from his current therapist. P.L.'s response was to ignore the colleagues concerns entirely and instead insist that it was they who had issues. P.L. also went on to suggest that they had to maintain boundaries which is rather laughable, as previous to their role as Christopher Hansard's therapist, they were under his care as his patient. A more recent email from his former fiancee would confirm this. Quote
..."P.L. is also the therapist I left Christopher in the care of when I left in February. When I tried to inform her that he was again sleeping with one of his patients immediately after I left, if not before, she averted the issue completely telling me I had 'daddy issues' and wishing me "peaceful healing in all dimensions."
Before P.L. became Christopher Hansard's 'therapist', she was a patient of his. In fact not that long before becoming his counselor. In the position of his therapist, she largely blamed his inadequacies on his students and seemed to have a particular dislike for S.W. She went as far as performing a 'treatment' that involved removing what she called "implants" from Christopher, that she said had been put there by his accusers and past students.
Her form of treatment was to hold colourful geometric shapes on laminated pieces of paper over Christopher Hansard's chakras, and speak to his 'higher self'. She also gained insight and answers using a small brass pendulum. .."
Quote
Christopher Hansard
in twenty years of working as a practitioner I have
never had any improper sexual relationship of any type with my clients.