Martin Luther King, Jr.was a plagiarist, and that's a documented, well-known fact. There was an official inquiry at Boston University (his alma mater) and everything.
[
www.snopes.com]
[
en.wikipedia.org]
When I first found this out years ago, I was shocked and outraged. What a colossal hypocrite, I thought to myself. It made me so angry at MLK that I could have spit. My image of the man was utterly shattered, just as my image of Hassan was utterly shattered when I came to understand his true nature. My mind was blown.
So one day when I was at my old undergrad University, I went to a professor in the Department of African-American Studies and asked him about the matter.
I'ts not a racist conspiracy that was designed by J. Edgar Hoover to discredit the man, I told him, it's just the simple truth. MLK was a plagiarist, a womanizer, and a liar. Why are academics so, so reluctant to talk about it, I asked him. I was outraged.
His answer was this:
Basically, he said that it seemed to him that Boston University (which awarded King the doctorate in the first place) would have to be the entity to take any action that would certify plagiarism. If they have not retroactively invalidated the awarded degree (then officially speaking) no act of plagiarism ever took place. And besides (said he), so what if they posthumously took the "Doctor" appellation from his name? Does it make MLK any less a martyr; even if he were a plagiarist and a womanizer (and he certainly was) did he not die for his cause? Are we to respect him less for these transgressions? After all, we all have feet of clay. This was his argument.
Same with Mr. Hassan. I see that now.
It's not the man himself, it's what he symbolizes, and the fact that folks in society in general (esp. black folks) derive hope from what MLK symbolizes (that is, HOPE) is the main thing, even if the man himself had feet of clay. And he very much did, even this professor had to give me that.
Everybody in the Department of African American Studies at my old Uni knows all about MLK and the scholarship issues. Now, I am not calling Hassan a plagiarist (though some have); I am saying that the principle (the man vs. the symbol vs. giving ex-members hope) is the same.
In other words: if I'd have known THEN (the first time I read his first book) what I know NOW about Hassan's true nature and character, then I would have lost all hope. Same with everybody else who has read
Combating and his other books. They have no idea who and what Hassan really is.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/29/2014 06:10AM by zeuszor.