Dave getting upset at someone not following his grammar rules
]I have always been critical of people putting down posters on any forum because of their poor spelling or grammar. People can't help it if they lack education. But laziness is a different matters. [sic] And arrogance. And pride. If you are too proud to spell "with" as "with" (instead of wif), then it has nothing to do with us feeling sorry for someone who is a bit slow in the head. I think it's a spiritual problem we are dealing with here.
I think the "spiritual problem" being exposed by this person is Dave doing his usual intolerance of difference. Like the sermon he gave on which way someone squeezes toothpaste out of a tube, who cares how someone says "wif", "fink", "fanks", or "ppl". It is quite cantankerous to make an issue big enough to cause a divide out of a word.
This person goes onto make a point using a deliberately misspelled paragraph that has done the rounds on email chains for years, i.e.fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt
I had to have a chuckle as Dave likes to be spoon fed information, and obviously gets quite upset if he does not get it NOW.
Dave even has two Dyslexic people of his group criticizing this person as a result. There will be no rest for them in his group.