Giibbs, very good points. KIK, ditto.
I am aware of some students saying something like this today:
'Of course Serge wont tell a reporter he is the re-incarnation of Leonardo da Vinci....most people don't believe in re-incarnation so he wont say things to confront them'
Which means, Serge can lie to the general public, and only tells them the 'truth'- All said without any consideration of how there is no integrity if that is in fact what he did. If he is prepared to lie to a journalist then he is simply a liar. Nothing else.
They say he has the most integrity of anyone they have ever known. Transparently, this is not the case.
If he believes in the things he has been saying for years, for gods sake have the moral fortitude to stick by it. I don't think any reader would have thought less of him if he had said 'Yes, I do carry the energy of Leonardo da Vinci but you will take that out of context' ( and if he uses that, we know where he got it (TM) )
The strange thing is that many of his followers are people of high integrity. The reason they align with him is because he claims unsurpassed adherence to truth. Yet, they can dismiss this, and other obvious un-truths as serving the greater good. The 'spherical truth' ( a thought replacing term for the 'ends justify the means')
Serge has sent an email where he seeks to blame the journalists for lying. Again Serge accuses others of his own failings. They may have some details slightly incorrect, but the facts are substantially right.
He then cleverly uses the word 'guilty' and twists it into a proof of his 'way' which is the only thing he is guilty of.
Then, as usual, he takes no responsibility for his actions, and in a 'special note' seeks to blame us, the vocal few of what we know to be hundreds of detractors, as the cause for this problems. Because we are jealous, loveless, not nice and possibly substance abusers numbing our pain and checking out. ( which I contend is what every UM student is doing with gusto)
There is much un-truth in what Serge says, but our dear friends lost in the samsara of Serge's world of illusions, know it not.
Just ask yourself some simple questions students. Why does Serge need defending and why is he asking you to defend him? if you 'feel' to? If he wasnt the head of some group that requires your allegiance, no defence would be required.
If he is simply a healer and you are paying clients, as he so eloquently called you in the MO article, then why is there a rush to circle the wagons and defend against the 'lies we knew were coming'
Why did you expect the lies to be coming? Did Serge tell you that would happen? Maybe he told you that because he expected one day, quite rightly, that he would have done enough damage that people would finally tire of it.
What has Serge got to lose and why do you defend him when it is at your expense.
The Reporters, the detractors as serge calls us have nothing to gain from lies. There is no financial reward and quite possibly no satisfaction of anyone ever realizing that your sole motive is to help. What reason is there for us to lie?
On the other hand there are literally many millions of reasons for Serge. And I am sure that is the next thing we will discover. [
wordsonsergebenhayon.blogspot.com.au]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/22/2012 08:54PM by COncerned Partner.