Current Page: 1 of 10
Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: December 11, 2011 08:00AM

All questions about research can be addressed here.

If one is discussing abuses by particular gurus and their organizations (eg Sogyal and RIGPA) those can be discussed on Sogyal related threads.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: December 11, 2011 08:07AM

Kalachakra--a discussion thread

[forum.culteducation.com]

Earlier discussions centered upon a paper by Sarah Caldwell analysing patterns of deceit in Hindu Tantra and the covenience of designating doe eyed malleable femals as the ideal consorts.

[forum.culteducation.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: December 11, 2011 08:09AM

Discussions of Campbell/Traveller in Space

[forum.culteducation.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: Misstyk ()
Date: December 11, 2011 09:06AM

Recommended reading on the history of tantra:

Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History by Ron Davidson
History of the Tantric Religion by NN Bhattacharyya
Tantrism by Benjamin Walker

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: Blue Dakini ()
Date: December 11, 2011 10:35PM

Passionate Enlightenment by Miranda Shaw
Sky Dancer by Keith Dowman

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: Misstyk ()
Date: December 12, 2011 02:29AM

The Dakini's Warm Breath, by Judith Simmer-Brown
Commentary on the Kalachakra Tantra, by Geshe Ngawang Darghey

"Passionate Enlightenment" is excellent for a view of what tantra was like before patriarchal culture took control of it. Thanks for the reminder. : )

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: Misstyk ()
Date: January 22, 2012 06:00AM

I just found this, posted by a Western lama in a discussion forum:

"The reason why the conduct of Tibetan monk is kept secret from lay people is so that lay people will not criticize monks. Part of the reason behind this is that all Tibetan monks are Vajrayana [tantric] monks, and so if their conduct seems to be not in keeping with Hinayana vows, they might get into trouble. Vajrayana monks are not under the same restrictions as Hinayana monks.

When one understands the fundamental principle of Vajrayana conduct is to engage sense objects and enjoy them for one's own pleasure, it changes the game of how one understands a Vajrayana monastic's conduct. The monastic thing is merely an outer show. It's not the essence of the practice."


In other words, the monks' robes, traditionally an indicator of renunciation of worldly life and pleasure, are merely a cover for a practice that is secretly indulgent, even to the point of abuse. Finally, an insider speaks the truth! "The monastic thing" is fake! It's all about enjoying sense objects for one's own pleasure--no wonder TB is such a scandal-ridden tradition. Scandal and abuse are fundamental to its nature.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: grainne uaile ()
Date: January 22, 2012 08:22PM

I was so shocked to see this coming from a man who keeps things, or used to on eSangha, quiet. Who once denied that June Campbell had sex with her teacher, the lama. Who threatened me on eSangha and even on Dharma Wheel becuse I was questioning my own teacher's teacings on DharmaWheel. And now these secret teachings are being spread around the board as if they were no longer secret, at least to some extent. Does this mean, according to the Kalacakra, that he is bound for Vajra Hell?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: Misstyk ()
Date: January 23, 2012 07:57AM

hmm, you're right, grainne. Sounds like you know the source of this quote better than I do. I remember a discussion in which he denied a member's statement that the celibacy is fake, and that TB has tantra as its highest, secret practices. This lama denied the accusations vehemently (as monks and lamas are instructed to do). He said the sexual practices are very rarely taught, but in the above quote, he seems to be saying that all Vajarayana monks practice by engaging with and enjoying sense objects.

I think it boils down to the fact that you can't trust what teachers say about the tradition, when they say it's a monastic, renunciate tradition. They give the official line publicly, then discuss the truth among themselves, privately. Prospective students should be aware that the robes and pretense of monasticism "is merely an outer show", and that the "conduct of Tibetan monks is kept secret from lay people" because they don't take the same vows as monks in other Buddhist traditions.

This would explain why Dzongsar Khentse Rinpoche once had posted on his website that Western men are "naive" to send their wives to Asia alone to study with lamas. He knew "the monastic thing" was just a pretense, and that female students are in danger unless accompanied by a male relative or friend. A friend of mine who visited Ladakh a few months ago made friends with a (Tibetan) Ladakhi woman and asked her about abuse by lamas. The Tibetan woman primly but honestly said "Many lamas are not nice. Women have to be very careful around them."

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tantra--Hindu, Himalayan Buddhist--problems
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: March 28, 2012 09:13AM

A very vigorous discussion of tantra and its problems here and in the comments section. No prisoners taken.

[chi-ting.blogspot.com]

Fuck your way to freedom ... It's a wonderful story ...


But sometimes it has a darker, shadow-side. Tantra, Taoist practices, Yab-Yum, Thelema ... These are all a form of abuse sold to you in the name of enlightenment. Sexual parasitism, rape and even human sacrifice: this is the heart of darkness which can justify almost any level of degradation at the hands of a Guru.


The quest for liberation through sex is the ultimate egomania. The Guru practises sexual excess, claiming multiple partners. "They are enlightened" so the normal rules of engagement do not apply. But this is a sinister puppet play - the fairy tale of the ego - which uses any means to justify its behaviour while engaging in an extreme demonstration of personal power. This is sex in separation, which is always a quest to burst the boundary of identity. At the point of orgasm existence can be transcended, this is why the desire for sex can be so insatiable. But this is just a transient awakening experience: temporary relief from the confines of the ego. The experience must then be sought again and again, inciting endless appetites and addiction ...


After separation passes there is no boundary. Everything is orgasm and rather paradoxically the need for orgasm ends. Orgasm happens when it does and sex is like an ongoing spiral, devoid of identity, twisting endlessly into infinity ...


Tantra is a counterfeit simulation of this endless wave of sexual energy. It is not an Osho-style Lurv-in for confused yuppies on a weekend retreat but a type of vampirism which abuses your partner for your own ends. Tantra attempts to copy sexual experience after separation has passed. It imposes a technique which deliberately avoids the male orgasm and attempts to summon and endlessly surf the energy of the female. A fantasy superhighway to Nirvana!


Taoist sexual practices seek the conquest of the feminine. In this realm women were seen as dangerous and to be feared. They have been branded "the enemy" because during sex the man can spill semen and lose vitality. Men were therefore encouraged to have as much sex as possible to replenish their life force - especially with young virgins who offered the greatest reserves of chi (qi). The male strategy was coitus conservatus (withdrawal before ejaculation) or applying pressure on the perineum to ensure that the jing was retained and channelled up the spine to nourish the brain. Meanwhile the female became a mere "crucible" or "stove" to be exploited for energetic ends. In effect a fleshy Duracell battery!


Tibetan Buddhism also has a secret world of occult and arcane sexual practices. The moral universe of the seeker is inverted with the consumption of menstrual blood, women's sexual fluids, excrement and even human flesh. The official hierarchy denies such practices even exist. Tibetan Buddhist monks take a vow of celibacy yet at the higher stages in their practice, they select a woman consort to balance their sexual energies (yab-yum). The aim is to attain enlightenment via the quickest possible path. Often threatened with death, the woman is sworn to secrecy and is under the total control of her lama. (For more info read June Campbell's expose of her illicit relationship with the irreproachable Kalu Rinpoche). This could also involve low-caste women who were considered of no account once they had been used up sexually. Afterwards they were simply disposed of or killed. Sometimes they were burnt alive (the legendary Burning Dakinis). But even in death they continued to function in the service of their tantric master. The sheer trauma of their sacrificial death saw them trapped between worlds like a Persian Jinn (Genie). Incapable of rebirth, the energies of these “murdered mudras" were then employed as malevolent Buddhist wraiths in occult rites. (This is eerily reminiscent of the macabre death of Radha Ma last year who self-immolated and was involved in tantric entity worship!)


This is all about the maintenance of patriarchy. Ageing male authority figures use their status to seduce young women or order them to sacrifice their sexuality on the altar of enlightenment. Denouncing the female, the hierarchical elite have turned the sexual act into an illicit black market commodity. They are then forced to bring it back in by hidden occult means. Behind closed doors dead male energy feeds on the vitality of the feminine, gaining access to sexual energy, usually forbidden beyond the cloisters. It's spiritual heroin and it's all about POWER.


A couple of worthy observations from the comments section

Mudra said...
I was in a tantric set up with a Tibetan Buddhist male for a year. I was engaging in this alongside my normal sexual relationship with my boyfriend. At the time I saw no conflict. The tantric relationship was secret, in the name of the Buddha, with a famous lama and it would also have massive spiritual benefits so it could only be positive - even for my boyfriend who didn't know. That's how I rationalised it and that it also what I was told many times by the lama concerned. But it is never so simple as that. I was clearly there for my lama's benefit and it was obvious he just wanted sexual experience which was otherwise forbidden. He said he was pursuing the whole thing for strictly spiritual purposes but it was obvious to me he craved sex and that also his spiritual rationalisations for using sex as a path to enlightenment were deeply flawed. Tantric sex is not balancing one's own energy with the opposite energy of the other to allow non-dual experience. It steals energy from the partner which then feeds the neuroses of the identity structure, makes the ego rear up and leads to massive energetic and emotional issues for both practitioners. You can inherit the psychosexual fixations of your tantric partner. There is a huge build up of pent-up rage and excess energy which blows the circuits psychologically and leads to disturbed behaviour. And don't think this is something which does not happen much in Tibetan Buddhism or that this was just a fucked-up lama. It is happening a lot. There are very real and dangerous consequences. You'll never get enlightened through it - but you can think you are getting very spiritual. I told my boyfriend and very luckily for me in the end he accepted what had happened. Of course I discontinued. But there are others who persist and even think they are more advanced than other mudras because they have not weakened and have stayed the course. They are spiritual sex slaves. And Tibetan Buddhist lamas who do this are deeply deluded: mired in a tradition which sees the woman as inferior and polluted and an "opportunity" to triumph over the darkness of the sense world.

March 26, 2012 9:26 AM
Anonymous said...
The whole tantric scene is about human sacrifice. It is not meant for the advantage of the practitioner. It is something that will give food to someone else. So forget the "spirituality" bit, it's total human exploitation. Most of those involved are not even aware of being just puppets in the hands of other masters, in an endless chain of slavery, all in the name of "freedom!" And those few who are aware, keep doing what they are doing out of fear, greed, attachment, stupidity, or just plain madness. On both sides it boils down to the same thing: taking advantage of the gullibility of people and their need to "be" something.

March 26, 2012 9:55 AM

Options: ReplyQuote
Current Page: 1 of 10


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.